On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 21:16, Oliver Tappe <zooey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2011-04-30 at 20:44:17 [+0200], Ryan Leavengood <leavengood@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: ... >> As I recall the contenders were Git, Mercurial, and Bazaar. Could we >> finally hear some results from this committee? As I recall at least >> Oliver Tappe and Niels Reedijk were members of this committee. > > That's right. .... > But there is a considerable amount of administrative work (on the server and > locally > by every developer) required in order to do a server-side switch between > version > control systems. So, we surely won't be stuck, but we should try to avoid > wrong > paths, if possible. ... > That's why from my POV, git is the way to go. I'm certain that administering the migration to a new VCS would be a respectable contract for Haiku, Inc. Last I saw, there weren't any time requirements on what is a viable contract, other than --mmadia