[haiku-development] Re: Final Set*UIColor Patch, Version 3e

  • From: Fredrik Holmqvist <fredrik.holmqvist@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: haiku-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 22:31:42 +0000

Yes, but at what point is it done? When the right approach and classes are
built, when every known bug is fixed or when every linebreak is correct.
If big changes never reach fruitation, or are taken over by someone who can
complete the work then it's just a waste of time for every one..

/Fredrik Holmqvist, TQH

fre 4 dec. 2015 23:16 Rene Gollent <anevilyak@xxxxxxxxx> skrev:

On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Fredrik Holmqvist
<fredrik.holmqvist@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
But that is beside the point. In tree is where we can work and
collaberate,
things evolve and improve. Outside it is a one man show where nothing
ever
moves forward. It is not working well. I don't like it that way. Feel
free
to discuss this instead of going personal and measure my commitment to
Haiku.

Does it really have to be 100% done just to get into our development
tree?

I was under the impression that part of the entire impetus of moving
the project to a DVCS to begin with was precisely the ability to
easily work on larger features outside of the tree until they're
ready. If it were something more minor, then that's one thing, but
when a patch is making large changes to critical system components
like the app_server, then personally I'm much more inclined to err on
the side of caution than to merge it before it's done.

Regards,

Rene


Other related posts: