On Feb 1, 2013, at 6:17 PM, pulkomandy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > We don't encourage custom builds of Haiku for all different CPU instruction > sets variants out there. We chose some requirements that make sense, and we > make sure to keep binary compatibility as long as it makes sense. So, this > doesn't need to be an easy task. ARM iterates rapidly and isn't finalized yet, and neither are the ABIs in use. Same for x86-64 and the other platforms. Nor are compilers finalized, where rebuilding the full OS is also valuable. >> This doesn't seem worth it for the 20 or so core dependencies that are >> necessary to build+run the OS, especially since most of the world to >> integrate them was already done, and now more work is being invested in >> lifting them back out of the source tree before genuinely automated tools >> to deal with them exist. > > Even more time is spent answering mails here. I don't know about you, but so far, I've personally spent a lot more time working around the 'optional' core OS packages than I have writing these e-mails, and looking at the list of things I'd be interested in working on, I expect I'll wind up wasting a lot more time on it too, especially if the number of required 'optional' keeps increasing. -landonf