On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 17:38, Ryan Leavengood<leavengood@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > don't think bedevtalk is good > because history or no we are not Be, we are Haiku. So haiku-dev-talk > is the obvious option but the name can be ambiguous in the same way > that Jonas was saying about "developing for Haiku". Some more > brainstorming: haiku-3rdparty-dev :) It even fits into Haiku's build system --mmadia