> "François Revol" <revol@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Didn't we say we would change "beos" for "os" ? > > While I would lean towards "system", I wouldn't be against this > either. > Any other opinions on this one? Well, I'm not totally against it, it was just not the good timing to ask (totally stupid parliament debate on the HADOPI bill till 1am to follow...) Still, after checking the current BeOS layout, it seems to be the intend was to separate classic beos "vendor" stuff from bare system files required to boot... though I suppose since sh is in beos/bin anyway... François.