Gerald Zajac <zajacg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Axel Dörfler wrote: > > "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> does anyone (besides Urias ;-)) have a good argument against > > > letting > >> the default boot splash resolution grow to 1024x768 by default? > >> This is chosen only when there is no EDID information available > > > (such > >> is the case with some graphics boards/monitors/all emulators). > > I should mention that this also affects the default resolution for > > Haiku if you're running it in VESA mode. > Some old video cards that have only 1 MB of RAM can handle 1024x768 > only > if the color depth is 8 bpp. Otherwise I see no problem with > 1024x768. It would then possibly prefer 800x600 with 16 bit over 1024x768 with 8 bit. Bye, Axel.