Stephan Aßmus <superstippi@xxxxxx> wrote: > > Actually, I am not a friend of that so much. I'm a friend of > > consistent > > and complete APIs, and that's something hard to achieve when one > > just > > declare various open source implementations as standard. That's how > > POSIX > > works for example, and I wouldn't call this a good API for the most > > part > > (at least it's consistently cryptic) :-) I rather like to take good > > open > > source implementations, and either integrate it completely, or at > > least > > have a wrapper around it that makes it convenient (= consistent > > with the > > common API) to use. > +1. As such, I'd vote for integrating InfoPopper. Maybe some parts > could be > shared by a tool tip implementation, which we are still missing as > well... > :-) I wasn't particularly targeting at InfoPopper here - I haven't had a look at its API, maybe it already fits perfectly, maybe not. Bye, Axel.