Am 16.09.2010 um 20:44 schrieb Ithamar R. Adema: > #3 was my idea of how things should probably be. Printer management > basically belongs in the print_server, and the interesting thing of CUPS > isn't really CUPS, but is the printer support. Printer support is > basically just Foomatic + Ghostscript + additional printing software.... > > So if you're after more printer support, CUPS is the least of your > worries, and Foomatic & friends, is what you're interested in! > > (If you look in the mailing list archives, I've posted mail with a lot > of links with the finer details in a previous mail) IIRC when I mentored the failed HCD 2008 CUPS Port effort, option #3 was also my preferred one. How does GutenPrint http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/ fit into that picture. It does add support for more printers. Bye, Michael