On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Bruno G. Albuquerque <bga@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > That was me. But my change was only supposed to also take into account the > extended model and family so newer processors can be identified. This > *DID* result in some weirdeness (like my Intl processor being identified > as a Rise processor) but the code is following to the letter the CPUID > instruction as described by Intel (it even returns the correct id to my > processor. Did you open a bug about it? > > -Bruno sysinfo attached to existing ticket 1979. Thanks, Rene