Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx> schrieb: > I would simply call it a more frame-centric view. "Caller" ist the > caller of > the frame, not the function that creates the frame. In the end it's > just a > matter of personal preference I guess. I don't quite understand what you mean, could you explain a bit more? The issue I see is that the frame pointer it prints is not the one of the function whose name it prints right next to it. The addresses (both, frame pointer and return address) it prints are always those of the function name one line below in the trace. In how far is that more "frame-centric" or useful? Thanks and greetings, Julian