2008/6/5 Stephan Assmus <superstippi@xxxxxx>: > Hi, > > Gerald Zajac wrote: >> Since some VESA 2.0 chips can not display a boot screen at a higher >> resolution such as 1280x1024, I suggest that for VESA 2.0 chips we >> restrict the maximum boot screen resolution to 800x600 or 1024x768. > > Would be fine by me. > >> BTW, the blank boot screen is associated with chips that are at VESA >> 1.2, and according to the syslog the resolution being set is 640x480x4. >> The monitor indicates that the resolution was set to 640x480, but nothing >> is displayed. > > The problem with this one is that the boot logo code currently does not > support any color index modes. Of which the 4 bit mode is even the worst. > There was some support in the old code, which I think did not get removed. > However, the problem to solve is to generate a best matching palette for > all involved bitmaps at once, and then use that. I am not sure if that ever > worked properly even before the changes. I believe this could be done by > the generate_boot_screen build tool and placed into the header it > generates. This would save time at boot and keep the kernel and/or loader > smaller. > > Best regards, > -Stephan > > Where does the 87Hz come from. Is that some weird interlaced rate by any chance (eg 43i)? Can't it be set to always use 60Hz?