[haiku-development] Re: Banning Jorge

  • From: Eguchi Satoshi <satoshieguchi82@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: haiku-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 23:59:05 +0900

I don't understand the meaning of the word "banning" in this case clearly...

If this word means that the administrator of the website, the MLs, and
the repositories will be switched from Jorge to someone, I don't mind.
But if the word means that he will be banned from *** all MLs *** in
haiku.org, I would like everyone to allow him to say something at least
in the haiku-i18n-jp ML.

Yours,
Satoshi Eguchi (log-1)


2010/11/4 Alexandre Deckner <alex@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Eguchi Satoshi wrote:
(snip)
> I want to say first that as a contributor you are part of the decision too.
>
> I have absolutely no doubt that Jorge is a valuable contributor to the
> Japanese community, and this has been said and repeated over and over by
> many individuals over the time: He was and can be a great contributor when
> he wants to! The problem is the bad side of the story.. Everyone tried hard
> to maintain a peaceful relationship (there's written proof of that) but
> unfortunately the community can't trust him anymore and during the past year
> or so, he has kept attacking the project and its community on the web. I
> don't understand why he keeps contributing if at the same time he hates the
> individuals and disagree with the direction the project is taking?
>
> So, concerning the community site, anyone is free to make and participate in
> a regional community site, even Jorge, the problem is that if the site
> controlled by him, i personally wouldn't trust him not using the site as a
> platform to continue to subtly attack the rest of the community, and thus
> create unnecessary friction between the Japanese community and the rest of
> the world. Anyone is free to work with who he likes, but i think you're
> taking an unnecessary risk in this case, personally and for the community in
> general. Ideally the main website would be fully multilanguage and anyone
> could help with translations, and there wouldn't even be the need for
> separate projects, but i digress :)
>
> Concerning conferences, i have the same trust issue, how can he represent
> the project when he hates the contributors? Let alone why does he want to do
> it?
>
> All this is my personal opinion of course...
>
> Best regards,
> Alex

Other related posts: