[haiku-development] Re: BString on GCC4

  • From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: haiku-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 15:37:19 +0200 CEST

Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx> wrote:
> I suppose we should rather get rid of the non-const version 
> completely and 
> introduce a SetByteAt[Unchecked]() or something like this. Since 
> BStringRef 
> is not inline, the operator call is unnecessarily expensive.

+1 - with GCC 4, we don't need to maintain source or binary 
compatibility in this regard, so I'm in favour of dropping it, too.


Other related posts: