2013/12/14 Adrien Destugues <pulkomandy@xxxxxxxxx>: > I don't think we should give commit access without going through the usual > process (submitting some patches and geting them reviewed without a any > problem). I'd rather avoid "special" commit access rules and look at > improving our workflow instead. And yes, I did mention gerrit which I think > is a very good tool for patch review, much better than our current > trac-based stuff or even the "pull request" system at github or bitbucket. My points exactly. In this case the clang github commits have been going to our commit-list and those commits have had quite a bit of review according to mails. So this is an edge case in that regard. In the bigger picture I think we need a way to keep track, and give better support to possible contributors. Right now there are so many hoops to jump through for potential non-GSoC contributors and quite a bit of work for devs as well. So I think it's not really good for anyone. I understand that full commit access needs to be restricted, but we need better ways to get there for both the contributor and the devs. Not sure how to solve that though. /Fredrik Holmqvist, TQH