Star's seed wrote: > I think that consolidating B_MOUSE_MOVED message in the window code > (ignoring old messages if a more recent exists) is a bad idea because > it's complex and consumes a lot of CPUCycle. ( PostMessage,GetMessage > DispatchMessage system_time ! _DequeueAll ! ) > > I think it would be better to post a B_MOUSE_MOVED message only if > the last mouse message in the queue is not a B_MOUSE_MOVED message. if it > is, we should modify the existing message by aggregating vertical and > horizontal shift. > this way gives good response times (like in other OSes) and should > prevent bugs when the message queue contains something like: > B_MOUSE_DOWNB_MOUSE_MOVED > B_MOUSE_MOVED > B_MOUSE_MOVEDB_MOUSE_MOVED > B_MOUSE_UP > B_MOUSE_MOVED > B_MOUSE_MOVED > B_MOUSE_MOVED I am surprised how much beating I get for a change that fixes quite a few issues... :-) Really, the situation before the change was *much* worse. Unfortunately, the solution you propose does not work, since the sender of the message can not peak into the queue of the receiver (unless I am missing something). However, Ingo posted a solution that would work a couple mails back. We are happily accepting patches. ;-) Best regards, -Stephan