[haiku-development] Re: A random thought about the Release process

  • From: Matt Madia <mattmadia@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: haiku-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 1 May 2011 23:11:33 +0000

On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 22:58, Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx> wrote:
>> In order for every non-necessary changeset[1] to be applied to the
>> release branch,
>> someone other than the committer would need to review it
>> and comment whether or not the changeset would pose a realistically
>> detriment to the stability | functionality.
>>
>> This would effectively reduce the workload of the branch maintainer
>> into something predictable,
>> easy to schedule, reduce the required working knowledge, and most
>> definitely make it less time intensive.
>
> Isn't that exactly what we did for alpha 2 [1]? Unfortunately the 
> participation in the review process was a little less enthusiastic than hoped 
> for.

In a way, I'm suggesting to minimize the number of changesets being
landed in the release branch ... going for more of a polish than
overhaul.

--mmadia

Other related posts: