On Nov 19, 2012, at 6:17 PM, Ingo Weinhold wrote: > To sum it up, the arguments that stick IMO: > > pros: > > * A developer only has to distribute a single package instead of one per > architecture. > > * A user doesn't have to pick the package for their architecture. > > cons: > > * Size. > > * Probably package management unfriendly. > > CU, Ingo Fair enough. I agree that there's some wiggle room on the package manager question. > PS: What I'd really like to see is support for LLVM bytecode binaries. Why > fat when it can be portable? Me too, but one of these things I'm capable of doing in a reasonable amount of time (end of Thanksgiving weekend, if things keep going smoothly?). The other, not so much :) -landonf