[haiku-depot-web] Re: Update; Version Ordering, Some UI Changes...

  • From: Andrew Lindesay <apl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: haiku-depot-web@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 21:48:52 +1200

Hi Stephan;

Thanks for letting me know -- it should be fixed in git now. It turned out to be a problem when you view a package that in in the "any" architecture. Oliver can you please take another snapshot build to the host; thank you!

My C++/STL knowledge is probably not deep enough to comment on the C++11 requirement. I just had a quick read about the "move semantics", but as you say, it is not hugely intuitive.

cheers.

On 14/05/14 8:27 pm, Stephan Aßmus wrote:
Hi,

Am 13.05.2014 12:35, schrieb Oliver Tappe:
On 2014-05-13 at 11:34:19 [+0200], Andrew Lindesay <apl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
A few changes just pushed.  Oliver; when you have a moment, would you
please build + deploy an updated version.  Here's the main changes;

Sure, done.

That was quick!

Andrew, I noticed for some packages that I have uploaded icons and/or
screenshots for, clicking them gets me to the error page. That is
be_book and bepdf on the first page, for example. be_book should only
have an icon. I also uploaded an icon and no screenshot for wonderbrush,
but viewing that package works. So I don't know what the pattern is. I
also noticed that using the browser's back button from the error page
just keeps displaying the error page.

As for your progress, it's very cool! I am eager to build the rating
functionality into HaikuDepot. I think it may be already more than two
weeks ago that I last worked on HaikuDepot, I was in the middle of
implementing a JSON parser. But now I think I should probably go with a
library instead, so I've researched those a bit again. There are a few
options, libjson on Sourceforge being one of my favorites. Some others
are even faster than that one, but rely on somewhat unintuitive C++11
tricks (move semantics in operator=()) to achieve it (rapidjason). And
relying on C++11 probably rules them out anyway, if HaikuDepot is
supposed to be compilable with GCC2, I guess.

Best regards,
-Stephan

--
Andrew Lindesay

Other related posts: