On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Julian Harnath < julian.harnath@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 01.03.2015 19:18, Humdinger wrote: > >> I can understand that argument. But I'm wondering if the workload to edit >> the title of every package, dev, tool and source won't be a bit more than >> we can handle. >> > > Yes, that is true, and it would make sense to prioritize the localization > of user-facing packages. I just don't see the need for a general rule to > never localize the other ones. It could still be in the "not mandatory but > nice to have" category. > I guess. So long as there's an option in HaikuDepot to show the original package names (or to show another column with the original names). Also: Somebody changed "beshare_x86" to "BeShare x86". Why not get rid of the "x86"? The end-user shouldn't know about this, so the only packages with "x86" ever left in the title (or _gcc2 on gcc4h) should be libraries, command-line-tools that don't also have a GUI, and devel packages. -Augustin