Rene Gollent <anevilyak@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Thanks for the cleanup :) Out of curiosity, which part failed to > build > on gcc2 though? Sorry for burying this one: the "member" variable could have been used uninitialized if there were no entries in the loop that was supposed to set it. Dunno if it was a real bug, but at least GCC2 didn't like it. Bye, Axel.