"Jonas Sundström" <jonas@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Axel Dörfler <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > ... > > we have plenty of stack space -- 128 bytes is a bit too cheap, > ... > > BTW, I find the SetToArguments() name rather awkward. > Clemens suggested Format() or SetToFormat. I chose the latter. > (See commit.) > > I would like to consider myself done, if there's no outstanding issue. > Feel free to make changes, though. Unfortunately, you just removed my remark about the current LockBuffer(0) strategy; I'm happy to hear any arguments that would make the current solution worthwhile, personally, I think it only covers a very unlikely special case, and is inefficient in the general case -- for a generic API, the usual aim is the opposite, though. Bye, Axel.