Rene Gollent <anevilyak@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 10:53 AM, <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > * Removed the (supposedly) private libalm.so from the image - > > nothing depends > > on it. > > * This also fixes a broken build, as libalm currently does not > > compile. > BALMLayout isn't using it? AFAIK it's part of it, but nothing part of the image is using it. Bye, Axel.