Am 05.08.2010, 10:20 Uhr, schrieb Adrien Destugues <pulkomandy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
I am missing the point, since the dicussion is not about removing the decorator support (which is there for the reasons you say, among others), but about whether the additional decorators should be included by default. How does including them by default help anyone with the points you mentioned?It allows to check that the decorator API is still working. They were not in the image for some time and they got very out of sync with other parts of the code, so I had to spend time bringing them back to life again. Since Clemens is doing changes to this API again, I'd rather make sure things don't break again. And apparently the only way to make sure is to make BOM slap the breakers :)
On the other side I don't want to fix all decorators, which have no real use, immediately when changing the decorator api. But I get your point and fixing the other decorators have always been on my TODO list, you guys were just faster :-)
Clemens
