On 2010-07-11 at 01:07:14 [+0200], Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx> wrote: > On 2010-07-10 at 19:27:45 [+0200], Oliver Tappe <zooey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: [ ... ] > > After all, we just use gcc2 for > > compatibility and BeOS didn't have proper wchars anyway. > > Indeed, though unfortunately ATM it is still the main compiler. The other > option would be to see whether it isn't too much hassle to hack the UTF-8 to > UTF-32 conversion into gcc 2. Damn, my strategy of not mentioning that myself didn't work :-P I'll have a look later today. cheers, Oliver