Alexandre Deckner schrieb:
Agreed. Someone capable of doing this with assistance of me? Where my part would be to pinpoint to the correct firmwares ;)Jérôme Duval wrote:Yep, they could at least be defined as optional packages (not for distributed images) to simplify testing for other devs.2009/12/2 Colin Günther <coling@xxxxxx>:Mmh, I guess you are referring to license issues. Currently I looked intoIntel firmware licenses only, which are demanding that a user reads the license BEFORE using the corrresponding driver.Those firmwares could be defined as optional packages of the installation CD. The installer would be able to have the user read the license before/when installing, and maybe detecting the hardware. It might be out of scope for R1 though.
On the other hand, it seems that linux distros dont have any problem including those by default, my ubuntu's /lib/firmware contains everything it seems.Regards, Alex
-Colin