2018-08-01 21:36 GMT+02:00 waddlesplash <waddlesplash@xxxxxxxxx>:
On Wed, Aug 1, 2018, 3:20 PM Jérôme Duval <jerome.duval@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
--------------------------------
0771d6b29621: runtime_loader: differentiate between secondary runtime
loaders.
[ Jérôme Duval <jerome.duval@xxxxxxxxx>
]
---------------------------------
Based on this and bootstrapping commits, the route you seem to be taking is
that compat_mode secondary packages will be different from non compat_mode
secondaries. Why? Can't we do what other Linux distributions do, and have
one set of _x86 packages for both gcc2h and x86_64h? Actually if we wanted
to go even further, there'd only be one set of packages per arch completely,
and any of them could be used as "secondary"
But no matter what, I don't see why a boostrap is needed for compat mode.
