On 01.02.2016 22:48, Axel Dörfler wrote:
> Am 01/02/2016 um 22:26 schrieb Ingo Weinhold:
>> On 01.02.2016 19:28, (Redacted sender humdingerb for DMARC) wrote:
>>> 66f815e0baa7: The yab package with a correct revision...
>>> bbjimmy informed me the correct revision is "1" as otherwise it
>>> would collide with the same package hosted on FatElk...
>> What does "collide" mean in this context? One repository really should
>> need to care about package revisions in another one.
>
> I guess there is a *NOT* missing :-)
Indeed. :-)
On 02.02.2016 08:28, Humdinger (Redacted sender humdingerb for DMARC) wrote:
On 1 February 2016 at 22:26, Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx> wrote:
What does "collide" mean in this context? One repository really should need
to care about package revisions in another one.
I guess he worried that having the same package with different
revisions in two repositories could cause issues (maybe updating
unnecessarily or not at all?). I wasn't sure, so I figured, better
safe than sorry.
Feel free to elaborate why there's nothing to worry about. :)