21 janvier 2016 13:38 "Dario Casalinuovo" <b.vitruvio@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit:
I think you are referring to some future behavior, and I actually can't seeIt was more explicit before, actually. Now you will happily run into an
endless loop when an
unforeseen condition happens (like a B_NO_PERMISSION, for example). Please
revert -- this code is
not acceptable.
why the loop should
exit on something different than the port close. The opposite situation may
happen, what if an
error code which isn't fatal makes the loop to exit?