On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 9:20 AM, Axel Dörfler <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Am 08.07.2015 um 15:04 schrieb Adrien Destugues:
Nebula used to run well on my 300MHz Celeron machine back then, probably
thanks to both the low resolution and the limited framerate. You don't want
a screensaver to use more CPU than the compiler running on the background.
That's exactly the point: even if your machine can easily cope with the load
(and as I said, I doubt many old systems can do so for 1920x1080 or higher),
you may not want to let the CPU spend that much time on it.
