On 17 November 2014 02:09, Axel Dörfler <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 11/16/2014 06:45 AM, Jessica Hamilton wrote: >> >> Instead of making more needless commit noise, does the attached patch >> look correct? > > > Almost, I wouldn't have said anything if you had just committed, but since > you asked... :-) > I would use a different name like _EraseUnusedBootBlock(), and move the > comment to a function comment, like this: > > /*! Erase the first block we don't use it, and there might be > * leftovers from other file systems in there. > */ > status_t > Volume::_EraseUnusedBootBlock() > { > [...] > } Thanks :-) I appreciate the feedback! I am still rather fresh committer after all :-) >> Also, I notice the existing code doesn't check for errors for the last >> handful of functions. As such, I haven't added error checking for the >> call to _PreparePartition(), unless these other function calls should >> be addressed to also check the return values. > > > Sure, error checking always makes sense :-) The day that we can switch to exceptions will be welcome relief ;-)