On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx> wrote: > On 01/17/2014 07:39 PM, John Scipione wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Axel Dörfler <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >>> Am 17/01/2014 14:49, schrieb pulkomandy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx: >>>> +static struct display_mode_hook { >>>> + bool active; >>>> + display_mode *dm; >>>> + struct { >>>> + uint16 width; >>>> + uint16 height; >>>> + uint16 space; >>>> + } mode; >>>> +} display_mode_hook; >>> >>> Should be called sDisplayModeHook instead >> >> I don't think that's true. I'm looking in the coding guidelines for >> confirmation and I can't find anything about this. Judging from >> examples in the source code C struct's follow the >> all_lowercase_underscore_variable_name_convention. > > Axel was referring to the variable, not the type. There's probably not even > a reason to name the type in the first place. Ah yes, my apologies.