2012/12/11 John Scipione <jscipione@xxxxxxxxx>: > On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Axel Dörfler <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Am 11/12/2012 19:24, schrieb korli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: >> >>> + if (timeout != NULL && (timeout->tv_nsec < 0 || >>> + timeout->tv_nsec >= 1000000000)) { >> >> Operator goes to the next line. > > And also is indented 2 times to show that it is a continuation of the > && operator rather than a new || operator. Thanks both for reading! It's taken into account on the trunk. Bye, Jérôme