[haiku-commits] Re: haiku: hrev44693 - /
- From: "Ingo Weinhold" <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx>
- To: haiku-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 23:51:11 +0200
Joseph Prostko wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > Urias McCullough wrote:
>
> >> Interesting - I always assumed it was a minimum-version check already
> >> that used some sort of logic to parse the filename...
> >>
> >> I think that would be the preferred approach.
> >
> > Not every newer gcc version is compatible with older versions of the Haiku
> > sources. Mostly they are, but we had one or two changes in the past where
> > that wasn't the case. So, changing the version check to a >= is not a
> > general solution.
>
> Okay, I will not commit my most recent change then that I just
> mentioned, as it does a >= comparison for native and cross builds. So
> what do you think the best course of action is? Leave things as they
> are now (bump to 121012), or rebuild the optional package with 111122
> and revert to 2.95.3-haiku-111122 for version.c and configure? If the
> latter, I'll make sure the zip filename has the current date, but the
> contents within will refer strictly to 111122. If the former, I guess
> there's nothing to do. :)
Yeah, I'd just leave things as they are.
CU, Ingo
Other related posts:
