On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Axel Dörfler <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > As Stephan pointed out, that's not entirely true. A common technique to > produce good results with bilinear downscaling is by iteratively scaling in > the range between 0.5 and 1 until you hit your target size. > Since bilinear is so cheap, this is still very fast, especially with smaller > image sizes, of course. Very informative, thanks guys. It is a little sad that this sort of stuff gets lost in this mailing list, though generally I can find it in Gmail if I have some idea of what I'm looking for. But overall this seems like stuff which could be added to the wiki. I'll put adding this to the wiki on my to do list and maybe I'll get around to it sooner rather than later. -- Regards, Ryan