Rene Gollent wrote: > On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx> wrote: > > The TODO was supposed to mean that the template parameters should be added > > to > > the name at that point ("function<...>(...)"). Probably not the best > > phrasing, but I think that the template parameters were indeed not available > > when I wrote it. > > That's how I understood the TODO as well, however, on gcc4.5 at least > I'm getting back function<param1, param2> as the DIESubprogram name > already. Will check gcc2 later though, I'll admit I forgot to look > there. OK, I don't recall, if I ever checked or just assumed the parameters would not be included in the name. > By the way, would it be worth including the parameter names too > (if available), not just their types? I don't see why at least. CU, Ingo