[haiku-commits] Re: buildtools: btrev43020 - jam

  • From: Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx>
  • To: haiku-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2011 10:00:48 +0100

On 2011-12-26 at 01:25:53 [+0100], Matt Madia <mattmadia@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 03:15, Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 2011-12-24 at 16:45:29 [+0100], Matt Madia <mattmadia@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > > In a bit, I'll be updating InvokeSubJam to $(JAM:E=jam) -q
> >> > > -j$(JAMJOBS:E=1) $(COMMAND_LINE) ;
> 
> > When you start jam with n jobs, you'll get up to 2 * n - 1 jobs in total.
> > This does of course depend on when the sub-jam is started.
> 
> Oh. I didn't consider that. Hmm... should I revert this then?

I'm not sure. I suppose in this case one would rather want to have extra jobs 
than only a single one. A comment to that effect would be nice, though.

CU, Ingo

Other related posts: