Am 24/10/2013 23:33, schrieb Ingo Weinhold:
On 10/24/2013 11:01 PM, Julian Harnath wrote:Any opinions on this? If I revert it in my branch it would be easier to do that early, before I add too many other changes :)FWIW, I'm a fan of descriptive type names. And in the media kit it is really easy to mix up performance, real, and system time. So IMO three different types (bigtime_t for system time) would be good. Ideally they wouldn't even be assignment compatible, but I guess that can't be done in a backward compatible way. Obviously it would be nice, if not only the API, but also the add-ons and applications (in our tree) using the API were adjusted. :-)
Same thoughts here. Having different classes would be the best way to go, but would unfortunately break compatibility.
Bye, Axel.