[openbeos-cdt] Re: Design Stuff ... and more

  • From: "Jess Tipton" <Shed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: openbeos-cdt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2002 20:18:33 CST

Well i have said in one of my emails that the Transperancy WAS NOT to 
be a feature, nor is any anti aliasing. They where added for fun. I 
have sent out an email in the list stating what in the pictures was 
important to me. 

>>First off my name is JESS, 
>>I can take constructive critisism but so far this is just insane. 
>>nothing but flames every one flaming every one & every thing & I 
>>dont know what ui options are going to be supported. I joined this to 
>>help Design system sounds & UI look. Right now every one seems set on 
>>doing logos & such but really this is a dead end disscussion till a 
>>real name is picked. FIRST off we need to know WHAT in the OS can we 
>>design for & PICK A NAME. OBOS is fine for now but the reality is at 
>>some point using BeOS any where in the name could become a legal hold 
>>up & I dont know about you but I dont have the money to pitch in on 
>>legal advice. 
>>- SHED
>Jess, the easy list of constraints for design is "whatever BeOS R5 is 
capable of now."  OBOS R1 will = BeOS R5.  As for the name, Michael 
Phipps still seems to be going with "OpenBeOS" and "OBOS" as the 
abbreviated form.  Designing things with transparency and antialiasing 
is a waste of time at this point - not because I like or dislike your 
designs or anyone else's, but because they cannot be used in R1 of OBOS 
if they contain such effects.
>As for the rest... I don't do any flaming, but I do feel that Stuart's 
concerns are valid.  I have been voicing the same concerns.
>This message was sent with the demo version of Postmaster, a BeOS mail 
>For more information, please visit http://kennyc.com/postmaster

Other related posts: