Afternoon Axel, > While this might not be the best attitude in open source development, > as long as you are as active as you are, this is not a problem, > anyway Maybe, and thanks ;-) > - but maybe we're also misunderstanding each other; usually a > component > has only one active caretaker. I guess that's what it boils down to: you have to try to split up stuff into pieces so that people can work on different pieces in the same time. If people want to work on the same piece, you have to find a way to split that in two pieces. IF that can't be done, then one should have 'control'. Just my point of view. :-) > But if someone finds something wrong with your code and sends you a > patch (or previously unknown insights), I guess you would welcome > him, > too. And that would be the usual open source approach; other people > don't change your code, they just send you patches to look over and > eventually commit. That's something I can work with, and indeed: I'd welcome such stuff. It even came up once or twice in the past ;-) There's one limitation however: I need to be able to keep up. (no prob yet) > BTW I will need to touch them in a few weeks, but I'll give you a > note > before. The reason is that I am (slowly) in the process of completing > the new hardware/driver recognition stuff, and this causes a new > driver > interface to be established. OK. Please explain before though. BTW do we also have to set that seperate 'allow cloning' flag for creating areas and such? As long as that doesn't interfere with R5 / Zeta, that would be OK to add as well I think. > Of course, I will do it in a way that still allows your drivers to be > used on R5. It will also only affect the kernel driver, not the > accelerant. Thank god :) The main concerns for me are: ->driver should keep working on R5/Zeta ->driver's speed should not be influenced in a negative manner ->interface driver/accelerant should remain as it is ->interface system/accelerant should remain as it is. (All R1 of course) Agreed?? >As part of that, though, I will also need to remove the > .driver part of your driver names. I also thought about renaming your > drivers to identify them easier (ie. neomagic instead of nm, nvidea > instead of nv, matrox instead of mga). This change could be > restricted > to the Haiku build as well, though. Renaming the drivers is OK. It's of no concern to me: just make sure they can easily be identified indeed ;-) Please keep the packages working as well (modify if needed)... No need to restrict that to Haiku Build I think BTW (?) Bye :) Rudolf.