Adi Oanca <adioanca@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Opinions? > > There is a little oversight on your part: the client side > > implementation doesn't rely on coordinates at all - it will work > > with > > non-rectangular shapes just fine. > Ah, OK. > Sorry, this week I didn't had time to look over the code. I just > assumed transit will be based on fLastMouseMovedView and the view > found > under the new mouse position. It's based on tokens, OK. It's based on both - but the important part comes from the app_server (it passes the token of the view under the mouse to the client). > I'll never spoke again before I consult the code :-P. No problem - your considerations were right, they just didn't apply to the code ;-) Bye, Axel.