[gptalk] Re: New to the list, vexing issue here...

  • From: "Thomas Marantz" <TomMarantz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 14:47:03 -0700

Do you have "Preference Mode" on?

 

From: gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Stephen Barash
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 2:42 PM
To: gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gptalk] Re: New to the list, vexing issue here...

 

Darren, I would think, but this only seems specific to IE administrative
template stuff. Other group policy changes I make do seem to propagate
to legacy users...

 

-Stephen

 

Stephen R. Barash

Clever Ducks-Computer Network Services

1413 Monterey Street

San Luis Obispo, CA 93401

p.805.543.1930 x15

www.cleverducks.com

 

From: gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Darren Mar-Elia
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 2:30 PM
To: gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gptalk] Re: New to the list, vexing issue here...

 

Stephen-

I wonder if this isn't a problem with the user profiles of existing
users not correctly picking up the policy settings. Is it possible that
permissions were screwed with on these existing user's profiles that
would prevent changes being successfully written using policy to their
HKCU hives?

 

Darren

 

From: gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Stephen Barash
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 2:28 PM
To: gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gptalk] Re: New to the list, vexing issue here...

 

Darren, thanks for the reply. No, no loopbacks in this environment. I
haven't fired up the userenv.log, I guess I'll have to do so. 

 

FWIW, this issue has been occurring for years - through promotions and
demotions of several domain controllers. Moving around fsmo's hasn't
helped.

 

I do have one separate GP for these users that uses the Windows Settings
- Internet Explorer Maintenance, which I know generally shouldn't be
used when using Administrative templates - IE settings, but that's the
only way I know to set certain settings like home page. But if this was
causing an issue, then why would everything work pass through for new
users?

 

Previously, to get things done, I've had to do a search and replace on
registry user keys for each terminal server to insert the settings, and
then rebuilt the 'default user' to include the change for new users. Not
fun!

 

I'll grab a userenv.log asap..

 

-Stephen

 

Stephen R. Barash

Clever Ducks-Computer Network Services

1413 Monterey Street

San Luis Obispo, CA 93401

p.805.543.1930 x15

www.cleverducks.com

 

From: gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Darren Mar-Elia
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 2:09 PM
To: gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gptalk] Re: New to the list, vexing issue here...

 

Stephen-

If you are using Admin. Templates IE zone policies then it wouldn't be a
tattooing issue. I wonder if some loopback issues might be throwing
things off. I presume you guys are using Loopback in a TS environment?
Also, have you fired up userenv.log to see what it is saying for a given
problem user?

 

Darren

 

From: gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Stephen Barash
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 2:01 PM
To: gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gptalk] New to the list, vexing issue here...

 

Hello folks, I've been trying to roll out Administrative Template IE7
Intranet security zone changes via group policy for a long time.
Gpmodeling shows the changes for existing users. With gpresults, the
changes are never picked up - gpupdate doesn't help.

 

If I create a new user, the new user does pick up these changes. But
no-go on the hundreds of existing users.

 

This is a load balanced terminal server environment, with roaming
profiles. I thought this may be a 'tatooing' issue, but tools like Clean
Registry Policy Utility don't seem appropriate as user profiles are
stored at a centralized location on a file server.

 

Any suggestions? Especially for a way to propagate these changes en
masse?

 

Thanks!

Stephen

 

 

Other related posts: