[gptalk] Re: GP setting for Outlook 2003 - Not showing....
- From: "Michael Pietrzak" <mpietrzak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 15:51:37 -0800
Hi Omar,
Yup, I'm covered on both of those. I created an entirely new GPO and
added the Outlook 2003 ADM to it. The date on the ADM checked out as
well 5\10\2007.
For the Outlook 2003 policies, they only appear in the User settings and
not in the Computer settings.
Thanks for the email Omar!
Michael
From: gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Omar Droubi
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 3:46 PM
To: gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gptalk] Re: GP setting for Outlook 2003 - Not showing....
Michael,
The Outlook ADM templates have to be imported into each particular GPO
you create unless you are using Vista/W2k8 and a central store. Also-
once you add in the ADM templates you should check both the computer and
user configuration nodes to see if it appears in one section but not the
other.
Omar
From: gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Michael Pietrzak
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 9:35 AM
To: gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gptalk] GP setting for Outlook 2003 - Not showing....
Hi there all. I've been trying to figure something out in the last 24
hours that has been quite confusing. The issue I am having is this, I
imported the most recent Outlook 2003 ADM files in order to enable the
option "Encrypt RPC Communication" but the option does not appear in my
group policies that I create.
I confirmed that I have the right ADM by double checking the excel
spreadsheet that breaks down the various settings and sure enough, it's
there. I have triple checked my steps, extracted the ADM, created a new
GP, added the admin template, and it's just not there. I tried it on
both my XP desktop and my DC.
The only thing I can think of, and perhaps someone can confirm this, but
do I need Outlook 2003 SP3 in order to see that setting? I am running
Outlook 2007 here on my local desktop so that's about all I can think is
the only thing holding it up.
If anyone has any thoughts, it would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Michael Pietrzak
San Diego State University
Other related posts:
