[gptalk] Re: DFS referral order
- From: David Cliffe <David.Cliffe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 17:16:01 -0400
Thanks Omar...your input is appreciated.
Presently I'm not troubleshooting any problems, but rather am particularly
interested in the fact that this pertains to SYSVOL. I can't help wondering if
this should almost be considered a "best practice" in that regard. I guess
that was the primary reason for my original post :-)
-DaveC
________________________________
From: gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Omar Droubi
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 3:34 PM
To: gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gptalk] Re: DFS referral order
David,
if you can upgrade your DFS servers to Windows Server R2 you can
benefit from many of the new features for branch office.
The problem that I assume you are encountering are very common amongst
Win2k and win2k3 DFS systems. The Win2k3 R2 DFS is worth upgrading to if your
company utilizes and wants to continue and use DFS.
Try these articles:
http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsServer/en/library/cb56e87b-b067-4ec2-a4ff-cbfb6210e8791033.mspx?mfr=true
http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsServer/en/library/cb56e87b-b067-4ec2-a4ff-cbfb6210e8791033.mspx?mfr=true
http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsServer/en/library/cb56e87b-b067-4ec2-a4ff-cbfb6210e8791033.mspx?mfr=true
<http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsServer/en/library/cb56e87b-b067-4ec2-a4ff-cbfb6210e8791033.mspx?mfr=true ;>
Omar
________________________________
From: gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of David Cliffe
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 11:57 AM
To: gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gptalk] DFS referral order
Hi all,
A couple of questions regarding this article and issue (one which I
am admittedly very late in realizing!):
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;831201
1) Is there any way other than a network trace to see the referral
order returned to a client?
2) In a medium [or larger] org, doesn't it seem that something like
this would be good practice even if there are no major problems? (maybe it's
already listed somewhere now and I missed that too though!)
Thanks for any thoughts,
-DaveC
This email was sent to you by Reuters, the global news and information
company.
To find out more about Reuters visit www.about.reuters.com
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Reuters Ltd.
This email was sent to you by Reuters, the global news and information company.
To find out more about Reuters visit www.about.reuters.com
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Reuters Ltd.
Other related posts:
