[gps-talkusers] Re: BrailleNote Version 3
- From: Todd Patkus <tpatkus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gps-talkusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 11:01:43 GMT
Hello, Les,
No. That is not the point! I have seen their bad attitude! I refuse to
squander my time, so it is really their problem, not me! Lisa will tell you.
Thank you.
> ----- Original Message -----
>From: "Les Kriegler" <lkriegl1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To: <gps-talkusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 01:27:23 -0400
>Subject: [gps-talkusers] Re: BrailleNote Version 3
>Hi Todd,
>If you want PDI to change and have more senswitivity toward the
>deaf/blind, publicly bashing them on the list isn't going to get it
>done. Before you respond to my comments, think about this for a while.
>Best Regards,
>Les
>-----Original Message-----
>From: gps-talkusers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:gps-talkusers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Todd Patkus
>Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2004 10:23 PM
>To: gps-talkusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [gps-talkusers] Re: BrailleNote Version 3
>Lisa,
>First of all, you know that I have been with blind technology for over
>25 years, so I am very well-aware of all what you stated below! What
>you said is correct, and that is absolutely NOTHING new about blind
>technology being inexcusably outrageous! Smile. But my pot is that,
>from what I perceive PDI, these staff are almost completely INSENSITIVE
>toward us deafblind, yes, so I stand by what I have told you. That does
>not change my mind! That does not mean I am against them, no, just that
>they show no sense at all! The good part is that the BN I have here
>does not belong to me, so, of course, I did not pay for this. You
>should be glad about it! Smile.
>That is all I could say at this time.
>Thank you.
>Todd
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "Lisa Kozlik" <lisak70@xxxxxxxxx
>>To: <gps-talkusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 21:00:23 -0500
>>Subject: [gps-talkusers] Re: BrailleNote Version 3
>>Todd,
>>I'd rather wait a little longer for a product that does what it is
>>supposed to instead of one that is hastily pushed out the door and
>>plagued with bugs.
>>How would you feel if you paid $6,000 for a Braille display that was
>>released 3 months early but didn't have the functionality it should to
>>allow you to work productively at home, school or work?
>>Blindness technology is expensive enough without having to worry about
>>spending hundreds or thousands of dollars on a piece of equipment that
>>doesn't work.
>>Lisa
>--
>Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
>Checked by AVG Anti-Virus (http://www.grisoft.com).
>Version: 7.0.253 / Virus Database: 263.4.5 - Release Date: 7/18/2004
>--
>Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
>Checked by AVG Anti-Virus (http://www.grisoft.com).
>Version: 7.0.253 / Virus Database: 263.4.5 - Release Date: 7/18/2004
Other related posts:
