On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 01:58:06 +0100, David Olofson wrote: > > Please read up on what DirectX automation does for parameter > > capture/release. (That's the terminology used there, > > capture/release like a mouse, rather than gestures which can easily > > be confused with musical performance gestures.) > > I vote for borrowing that terminology. It makes sense, whether we're > talking about GUI widgets, physical controllers or weird event > processors that might want to (ab)use the feature. Agreed. > What you describe sounds to me *exactly* like what we've been > discussing, except that it appears to be using function calls rather > than events. (And no IDs, but that's additional information, and > doesn't really change the logic behind the capture/release feature.) I think the point is that the plugin has to request reception of capture/release events from the host. Sounds like a good idea to me, one less thing to process. - Steve ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not redistribute anyone else's words without their permission. Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe