I thoroughly agree. I wanted to say something like that, but couldn't manage to express it as well Steve just did... Marc On Thu, 24 Apr 2003, Steve Harris wrote: > On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 09:05:33AM -0400, Angus F. Hewlett wrote: > > > I'm also not sure that you're not romanticizing the GMPI effort and aims a > > > bit. But I'm glad you are making that all explicit and asking what others > > > think and feel in this regard... > > > > I'm just thinking about an API I might have to use in 20 years' time. That > > said, an open/free, thoroughly cleaned-up second-generation API would be > > of considerable benefit in any case, and AU is certainly a sensible base > > to start such an effort from if Apple are able to meet our requirments for > > freeness/openness. > > I think its very unlikly that anyone will be using current or near future > plugin technologies in 20 years time. > > MIDI basicly survived that long because its very hard to upgrade (it > involves hardware) and it's good enough. The requirements for host based > processing can, and most likly will, change much more rapidly and there is > a much lower barrier for change. > > It's not that I think we should ignore potential future directions, but > they can introduce unnecessary complexity if you're not careful. > > Too many standardisation programs get to the end and find that thier > obsolete. For me, solving the problems that we have here and now, simply > and efficiently is the best thing we can do. > > - Steve ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not redistribute anyone else's words without their permission. Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe