Hey All, > My two cents: > Folks seem to like SMPL. SMPL might be attractive to the developer who has > to write the code to support the API... :) but I think that to the > consumer, SMPL = basic, not professional. > > -=A Wow! Do I ever agree. There are a lot of kinda scary names whipping by on the list (sorry, gotta be honest). I agree that sometimes names with negative and amusing connotations can be fun. But YIKES! Please make it more obvious if the message is on the gag-name side for efficient mail browsing :^). I know I am a newbie to the list, but as a marketing-type I would support the notion of choosing something that sounds *totally* positive and professional. You may want to look at conventions of other successful multiplatform standards groups for an "associative positive branding opportunity", ala XML, OpenGL, etc... Unfortunately OpenAL is taken. I would also suggest the obvious point that after a list is generated that it is run by a focus group/example users for final evaluation since it's not about my views but the perception of others. The old "give 'em a list and ask what the name means to them" bit. Always quite revealing and fun. While there you can always float useage models. So far my favorite is probably: > AXIS - Audio eXtension Interface System Actually quite a nice name and appealing to Hendrix fans. Of course we could call it "DirectTime" OR "QuickX" (*hee hee*) :^). Cheers, Kord Taylor *NEW* cell number: 253.224.3807 syntropique@xxxxxxx ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not redistribute anyone else's words without their permission. Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe