[gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
- From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 20:44:27 +0000
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 09:09:22AM -0800, Tim Hockin wrote:
> > > We're supposed to be forward thinking, right?
> >
> > Hmmm... IMHO stardards should not require research to get them written.
> > If you are writign anything into the standard which has need been tried
> > and tested in muptiple systems you're asking for truoble.
>
> A *lot* of what we're talking about in GMPI is experimental. If we really
> want to take the approach of not experimenting, then we should be keeping
> everything very simple and similar to what exists today.
I havent seen anything go past that I think is experiemental (I would have
complained). Ramps exists in DX and audality at least, events in many
systems, unified audio data in VST and LADSPA, MIDI parsing in
alsa-sequencer, metadata in LADSPA. What is experimental? I've seen this
more as taking the best features from each system.
- Steve
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
