[gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- From: Chris Grigg <gmpi-public@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:51:56 -0800
Tim said:
I think it is dubious whether people will really mix float and non-float in
any meaningful way.
Can I just press you on this point? Because the rest of your
response seems to kind of depend on this.
Say I buy a nice DSP accelerator -- I dunno, TC Works or Universal
Audio or something -- for my (hypothetical, unfortunately)
dual-processor G5 running Digital Performer. Why would I not want to
be able to insert DSP (fixed) plugs and native plugs (float) in any
desired order? I think that's exactly what people will want to be
able to do, indeed will expect. Do you see it differently?
Or am I misunderstanding and by 'people' you mean programmers, not users?
Or am I misunderstanding in a different way, and you're thinking that
fixed-point DSP card vendors will supply GMPI adaptor shells that
handle the bridge to DSP space and the conversion to/from fixed point?
Most likely I'm just being dense; if so, sorry in advance.
-- Chris G.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
- » [gmpi] on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)