[gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- From: <Jarmo.Hiipakka@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 09:38:23 +0200
From Tim's mail to Ron:
> There are two NO's involved in one of your prior emails, and in the point I
> am willing to concede:
>
> no mixing types in a plugin
> no mixing types in a graph (unless the host wants to take o the challenge)
>
> My proposal was actually:
>
> no mixing types in a plugin (or maybe yes)
> yes mixing types in a graph (via GMPI-provided converters)
>
>
> I'm willing to concede to the NO+NO point of view, if that is where everyone
> sits. I thought that was where you were. Was I wrong?
What I was originally hoping for, is what Tim originally proposed,
i.e., MAYBE+YES (this puts me in the PERHAPS camp, too). If GMPI
allowed mixing types in a plugin, you could, e.g., change to
a different dithering plugin, if your favourite host didn't perform
that optimally. For mixing types in a graph I do see _real_ use on
platforms that are gradually developing in their floating point
performance.
However, I don't feel that strongly about this. I'm fine as long as
there is support for an integer sample type (profile), and supporting
multiple profiles in a host is not made too complex and difficult.
Time to close this one?
Best Regards,
Jarmo Hiipakka
----------------------------------------------
Jarmo Hiipakka, Research Engineer,
Nokia Research Center, Helsinki, Finland
jarmo.hiipakka@xxxxxxxxx, +358 50 483 6538
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
- » [gmpi] on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)
- » [gmpi] Re: on mutliple sample types (OT, but let's finish?)